기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

[] [CK] LYME DISEASE WORKUP IN NEW CARDIAC BLOCK(ARRHYTHMIA)

NEW ONSET OF CARDIOMYOPATHY(FUNCTIONAL BLOCK)
1. LYME?
2.AUTOIMMUNE?
3.VIRAL


SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The diagnosis of early Lyme disease can be made solely on clinical grounds if the characteristic erythema migrans (EM) lesion is present in a patient who lives in or has recently traveled to an area that is endemic for Lyme disease (picture 1and picture 2). The patient with a characteristic EM lesion will likely be seronegative, since the lesion appears prior to development of a diagnostic, adaptive immune response. Laboratory testing is neither required nor recommended. (See 'Approach to diagnosis' above.)
In contrast to the negative serology at the time of the appearance of the EM lesion, by the time the patient has findings of early disseminated extracutaneous disease (eg, lymphocytic meningitis, facial palsy, radiculoneuropathy, carditis with heart block), serologic tests are typically positive, as they are in patients with late Lyme disease. (See 'Approach to diagnosis' above.)
Serologic testing should be performed in patients who meet all of the following criteria:
A recent history of having resided in or traveled to an area endemic for Lyme disease
and
A risk factor for exposure to ticks
and
Symptoms consistent with early disseminated disease or late Lyme disease (eg, meningitis, radiculopathy, mononeuritis, cranial nerve palsy, arthritis, carditis) (see 'Indications for serologic testing' above)
Serologic testing for Lyme disease should not be performed in the following settings:
In patients with an EM rash. Patients with skin rashes consistent with EM who reside in or have recently traveled to an endemic area should be treated for Lyme disease. (See "Clinical manifestations of Lyme disease in adults", section on 'Erythema migrans' and "Lyme disease: Clinical manifestations in children", section on 'Erythema migrans' and "Treatment of Lyme disease", section on 'Early disease'.)
For screening of asymptomatic patients living in endemic areas
For patients with non-specific symptoms only (eg, fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias). The use of serologic testing in populations with a low pre-test probability of Lyme disease results in a greater likelihood of false-positive test results than true positive test results. (See 'Indications for serologic testing' above.)
A skin lesion similar to EM can be seen in Southern tick-associated rash illness (STARI); however, the geographic distribution of Lyme disease and STARI are usually different (exceptions are Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey). (See 'Distinction from STARI' above.)
When serologic testing is indicated, two-tier testing is recommended. The traditional approach uses an whole cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by a Western blot as the tests of choice. However, Western blot testing can be difficult to perform and interpret; thus, alternative algorithms that eliminate the need for Western blot testing are being tested (See 'Serologic testing' above.)
Routine follow-up serologic testing is not recommended in assessing the patient who is cured or slowly improving. (See 'Persistence of antibodies' above.)
The diagnosis of neurologic Lyme disease and Lyme arthritis are discussed separately. (See "Nervous system Lyme disease", section on 'Diagnosis' and "Musculoskeletal manifestations of Lyme disease", section on 'Laboratory testing'.)
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of specimens of CSF or synovial fluid for Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in a reliable laboratory can add confirmatory information in seropositive patients. However, a positive PCR result by itself is likely to be a false-positive result, and a positive result does not prove that the patient has active infection, since spirochetal DNA may persist long after spirochetal killing has occurred. (See 'Polymerase chain reaction' above.)
Use of laboratory tests other than those described above (ELISA, Western blot, and in limited cases, PCR), to support a diagnosis of Lyme disease is notrecommended. (See 'Special considerations' above.)

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

[CK] Preventing aspiration.

960 × 720 저작권 보호를 받는 이미지일 수 있습니다.    자세히 알아보기 https://www.google.com/search?q=position+to+prevent+aspiration&rlz=1C1GCEV_enUS820US820&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8NbnkoDfAhUs4YMKHZhrBM8Q_AUICSgA&biw=1177&bih=859&dpr=1 HOB 30-45 degree. => resting turn head to Rt. side. or lateral position => for seizing or unconsciousness. 

[CK] STEMI_EKG learning.

892 × 548 저작권 보호를 받는 이미지일 수 있습니다.    자세히 알아보기 ECG - Common STEMI Mimics | Grays Integrative Physiology Grays Integrative Physiology Mimics will not produce reciprocal changes. If RCs in related leads, should consider it a STEMI. 방문 추가 컬렉션 공유

[CK] Stress-dose gluticocorticoid(steroid) [v ] read and sum! (50mcg IVP solucortef vs 125mg solumedrol=for steroid user>5mg pred.)

STRESS DOSE Solucortef 50mg q6hr ! or Solumedrol 60-125mg iv q6-8hr !(severe sepsis shock or known prednisone user !) https://www.uptodate.com/contents/glucocorticoid-therapy-in-septic-shock?topicRef=1613&source=see_link Summary ● Random <10 but don't rely on lab test. => just do it if it's indicated in critically ill patient.s  ● "functional" adrenal insufficiency, "relative" adrenal insufficiency,  "critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI)."  =But a clear definition is lacking ● Less severe septic shock: restored by fluid and pressor = corticosteroid therapy does not appear to be beneficial. ● Severe septic shock: sBP <90 with adequate fluid + vasopressor (more than 1 hr, NE >0.5) .=> may need to add 2nd dose or...  = reduces weaning pressor quicker. => start within 24hours for severe septic shock.   ●   ACTH stimulation testing is not clinically useful. Recommendat